Purpose: to study the technological process of loosening the soil with a flat-cutting blade and a tine.
Materials and methods: the methods of analyzing the power impact on the tine, as well as the theoretical provisions of failure hypotheses are used. As an object of research, the working bodies of tools with a horizontal cutting edge were considered, namely, flat-cutting blades which are used for overall tillage.
Results: as a result of studies it was found that the main parameters of flat-cutting blades include: operating width Bi, opening angle 2γ, crumbling angle β0, edge angle i0, band width b, which determine the blades shape and the nature of the impact on the soil. When considering the layout of the soil deformation zones, i. e., the simultaneous combined effect of the tine and plowshares of the horizontal blade, it was found that the zones for obtaining fine soil fractions increase, and a decrease in the thickness t of tine and the operating width of the share B affects the crumbling value. This, in turn, allows regulating the zones for obtaining fine soil fractions and determining the optimal composition of blade width and tine thickness for better crumbling.
Conclusions: according to the research results, it was found that the generalized estimated indicator (W) of options for deep tillage ranges from 0.82 to 0.84, for shallow loosening from 0.84 to 0.87, and for surface shallow tillage from 0.845 to 0.870. For loosening soil with mixing crop residues with soil particles, the option W = 0.84 with a vertical tine t = 2.0 cm and a blade operating width of 42.0 cm is acceptable. For surface and presowing tillage, the most suitable options are WX = 0.87 and WXI = 0.85, allowing carrying tillage to a depth of 6–10 cm.
DOI: 10.31774/2222-1816-2020-4-241-255
soil loosening; flat-cutting blade; tine; technological process; analytical method.
Kambulov, S. I. Technological process of soil loosening by flat cutting blade and tine / S. I. Kambulov, O. S. Babenko, I. V. Bozhko // Scientific Journal of Russian Scientific Research Institute of Land Improvement Problems [Electronic resource]. – 2020. – № 4(40). – P. 241–255. – Mode of access: http:www.rosniipm-sm.ru/en/article?n=1169. – DOI: 10.31774/2222-1816-2020-4-241-255.
1 Abdulkhaev Kh.G., Khalilov M.M., 2019. Obosnovanie parametrov nozhey vyravnivatelya-rykhlitelya [Determining the parameters of leveler-ripper shanks]. Sel'skokhozyaystvennye mashiny i tekhnologii [Agricultural Machines and Technologies], vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 44-47, DOI: 10.22314/2073-7599-201913-3-44-47. (In Russian).
2 Mamkagh A.M., 2019. Effect of soil moisture, tillage speed, depth, ballast weight and, used implement on wheel slippage of the tractor: A review. Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research, no. 9(1), pp. 1-7, DOI: 10.9734/AJAAR/2019/46706.
3 Sidorov S.A., Lobachevsky Ya.P., Mironov D.A., Zolotarev A.S., 2020. Vliyanie geometricheskikh i ustanovochnykh parametrov pluzhnykh rabochikh organov na agrotekhnicheskie i silovye kharakteristiki [Influence of geometric and setup parameters of plow working bodies arrangement on agrotechnical and power characteristics]. Sel'skokhozyaystvennye mashiny i tekhnologii [Agricultural Machines and Technologies], vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 10-16, DOI: 10.22314/2073-7599-2020-14-2-10-16. (In Russian).
4 Zhuk A.F., Yunusov G.S., Akhmadeeva M.M., 2018. Obespechennost' rastenievodstva pochvoobrabatyvayushchey tekhnikoy: sostoyanie i perspektivy [Security of crop cultivation with tillage equipment: state and prospects]. Vestnik Kazanskogo GAU [Bulletin of Kazan GAU], no. 1(48), pp. 132-137, DOI: 10.12737/article_5afc15a191d8c6.03289880. (In Russian).
5 Syromyatnikov Yu.N., 2018. Pokazateli kachestva raboty pochvoobrabatyvayushchey rykhlitel'no-separiruyushchey mashiny [Qualitative performance indicators of a ripping-separating machine]. Sel'skokhozyaystvennye mashiny i tekhnologii [Agricultural Machines and Technologies], vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 38-44, DOI: 10.22314/2073-7599-2018-12-3-38-44. (In Russian).
6 Liskin I.V., Lobachevsky Ya.P., Mironov D.A., Sidorov S.A., Panov A.I., 2018. Rezul'taty laboratornykh issledovaniy pochvorezhushchikh rabochikh organov [Results of laboratory studies of soil-cutting working bodies]. Sel'skokhozyaystvennye mashiny i tekhnologii [Agricultural Machines and Technologies], vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 41-47, DOI: 10.22314/2073-7599-2018-12-4-41-47. (In Russian).
7 Al-Suhaibani S.A., Al-Janobi A.A., Al-Majhadi Y.N., 2010. Development and evaluation of tractors and tillage implements instrumentation system. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 3, iss. 2, pp. 363-371, DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2010.363.371.
8 Askari A.M., Komarizade M.H., Nikbakht A.M., Nobakht N., Teimourlou R.F., 2011. A novel three-point hitch dynamometer to measure the draft requirement of mounted implements. Research in Agricultural Engineering, vol. 57, pp. 128-136, DOI: 10.17221/16/2011-RAE.
9 Tenu I., Carlescu P., Cojocariu P., Rosca R., 2012. Impact of agricultural traffic and tillage technologies on the properties of soil. Resource Management for Sustainable Agriculture, Oct., pp. 263-296, DOI: 10.5772/47746.
10 Rosap U.A., Wulfsohn D., 2008. Soil bin monorail for high-speed testing of narrow tillage tools. Biosystems Engineering, vol. 99, iss. 3, pp. 444-454, DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.11.010.
11 Amin M., Khan M.J., Jan M.T., Rehman M.U., Tariq J.A., Hanif M., Shah Z., 2014. Effect of different tillage practices on soil physical properties under wheat in semi-arid environment. Soil and Environment, June, vol. 33, iss. 1, pp. 33-37.
12 Novikov Yu.F., 1970. Metodika korrelyatsionnogo analiza protsessa razrusheniya pochvy pod vozdeystviem rabochikh organov pochvoobrabatyvayushchikh mashin [Methods of correlation analysis of the process of soil destruction under the influence of working bodies of tillage machines]. Metody issledovaniy protsessov mekhanizatsii v sel'skom khozyaystve: sb. tr. [Methods of Research of Mechanization Processes in Agriculture: coll. of art.]. VNIPTIMESH, Rostov-on-Don, Rostov Publ., iss. 1, pp. 75-82. (In Russian).
