Purpose: to conduct a field comparison of four technologies and materials for waterproofing irrigation canals and to select the optimal solution based on a combination of hydraulic, operational, and economic indicators under high water mineralization and intense climatic impacts typical for the Southern Federal District.
Materials and methods. The objects of the study were six irrigation systems with a total canal length of 45.5 km. Cement-sand mortar (T1), polymer-cement composite (T2), bitumen-polymer emulsion (T3), and modified fiber-reinforced concrete with silicon dioxide and an aqueous alkaline solution of sodium silicates (T4) were successively used on test sites with identical hydraulic parameters. The efficiency was assessed on the basis of water impermeability measured by the AGAMA-2RM device, seepage losses calculated using a refined formula taking into account the hydraulic gradient, adhesion recorded by the normal pull-off method, frost and sulfate resistance, and life cycle cost over a 50-year design period. Statistical processing was performed using the Student's t-test and one-way ANOVA test.
Results. Modified fiber-reinforced concrete ensured a reduction in seepage losses by 85–90 % (p < 0.01), water resistance grades W12–W14, adhesion of 1.98–2.35 MPa, and an estimated period between repairs of 40–50 years. At a real discount rate of 9.4 % per annum, the life cycle cost of T4 option was 41.2 million rubles/km versus 59.3 million rubles/km with traditional cement-sand repairs, which corresponds to a 1.44-fold reduction, a net discounted effect of RUB 18.1 million/km for the calculation period, and an average annual effect 1.72 million rubles/km. Water savings amounted to 75,000 cubic meters per year per 1 km of canal.
Conclusions. Modified fiber concrete is recommended for waterproofing irrigation canals with water mineralization above 2.0 g/l and sulfate concentrations above 1000 mg/l. This advantage is consistent across the entire range of discount rates studied.
doi: 10.31774/2712-9357-2026-16-3-43-66
irrigation canals, waterproofing, seepage loss, water impermeability, polymer-cement composites, fiber concrete, reclamation systems
Kovalenko I. A. Field comparative studies of the efficiency of modern technologies and materials for irrigation canals waterproofing. Land Reclamation and Hydraulic Engineering. 2026;16(3):43–66. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31774/2712-9357-2026-16-3-43-66.
1. Pakhomov A.A., Kulagina O.A., Kolobanova N.A., 2017. Sovremennyy meliorativnyy kompleks – strategicheskiy faktor razvitiya sel'skikh territoriy [Modern land reclamation complex – a strategic factor in the development of rural areas]. Ekologo-meliorativnye aspekty ratsional'nogo prirodopol'zovaniya: materialy Mezhdunar. nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Ecological and Reclamation Aspects of Rational Nature Management: Proc. of the International Scientific-Practical Conference]. Volgograd, vol. 2, pp. 421-427, EDN: ZNIZUN. (In Russian).
2. Talalaeva V.F., Baev O.A., Kolganov A.V., 2025. Rezul'taty otsenki tekhnicheskogo sostoyaniya vodoprovodyashchey seti kanalov i sooruzheniy Respubliki Kalmykii [The results of the technical condition assessment water supply network of canals and structures the Republic of Kalmykia]. Melioratsiya i vodnoe khozyaystvo [Land Reclamation and Water Management], no. 1, pp. 12-17, DOI: 10.32962/0235-2524-2025-1-12-17, EDN: XOWSZZ. (In Russian).
3. Bandurin M.A., Volosukhin V.A., 2021. Bezopasnost' sooruzheniy vodnogo khozyaystva yuga Rossii: novye vyzovy i puti resheniya [Safety of Water Management Facilities in the South of Russia: New Challenges and Solutions]. Krasnodar, Kuban State Agrarian University, 203 p., EDN: UFENAQ. (In Russian).
4. Garbuz A.Yu., Talalaeva V.F., 2021. Tekhnologiya remonta betonnykh oblitsovok kanalov bitumno-polimernoy mastikoy [Repair technology of canal concrete lining with bitumen-polymer mastic]. Melioratsiya i gidrotekhnika [Land Reclamation and Hydraulic Engineering], vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 299-313, DOI: 10.31774/2712-9357-2021-11-3-299-313, EDN: BWOBXB. (In Russian).
5. Garbuz A.Yu., 2015. Remont povrezhdeniy oblitsovok dlitel'no rabotayushchikh kanalov s ispol'zovaniem polimernykh kompozitsiy [Repair of lining damage of long-term operating canals using polymer compositions]. Puti povysheniya effektivnosti oroshaemogo zemledeliya [Ways of Increasing the Efficiency of Irrigated Agriculture], no. 2(58), pp. 33-39, EDN: TZLZVN. (In Russian).
6. Bandurin M.A., Volosukhin V.A., Yurchenko I.F., Vanzha V.V., Mikheev A.V., 2018. The efficiency of impervious protection of hydraulic structures of irrigation systems. International Scientific and Practical Conference “Agro-SMART – Smart Solutions for Agriculture” (Agro-SMART 2018), vol. 151, Tyumen, Atlantis Press, pp. 56-61, EDN: YUEQZF.
7. Kosichenko Yu.M., Baev O.A., 2014. Teoreticheskaya otsenka vodopronitsaemosti protivofil'tratsionnoy oblitsovki narushennoy sploshnosti [Theoretical assessment of water permeability of impervious facing discontinuities]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Tekhnicheskie nauki [Bulletin of Higher Educational Institutions. North Caucasus Region. Technical Sciences], no. 3(178), pp. 68-74, EDN: SEZRCD. (In Russian).
8. Kosichenko Yu.M., Baev O.A., 2021. Selection of an effective seepage-control lining for canals made of traditional and geosynthetic materials. Power Technology and Engineering, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 819-824, DOI: 10.1007/s10749-021-01293-4, EDN: BGPPXV.
9. Ishchenko A.V., Baev O.A., 2017. Otsenka effektivnosti protivofil'tratsionnogo ekrana na Donskom magistral'nom kanale [Evaluation of the efficiency of the impervious screen on the Don Main Canal]. Gradostroitel'stvo i arkhitektura [Urban Construction and Architecture], vol. 7, no. 4(29), pp. 67-72, DOI: 10.17673/Vestnik.2017.04.11, EDN: YVSVJR. (In Russian).
10. Istomin A.P., Solodovnikov D.A., Istomin S.A., Kovalenko I.A., 2024. Primenenie metodov nerazrushayushchego kontrolya dlya obsledovaniya gidrotekhnicheskikh sooruzheniy [Application of non-destructive testing methods for inspection of hydraulic structures]. Izvestiya Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetskogo kompleksa: nauka i vysshee professional'noe obrazovanie [Proceedings of the Lower Volga Agro-University Complex: Science and Higher Professional Education], no. 1(73), pp. 381-392, DOI: 10.32786/2071-9485-2024-01-43, EDN: HXAPOY. (In Russian).
11. Suprun V., Kovalenko I., Ustinova V., 2024. The GPR survey method in combination with destructive testing methods for the hydraulic structures technical condition studying. Magazine of Civil Engineering, vol. 17, no. 6(130), 13002, DOI: 10.34910/MCE.130.2, EDN: PNKOED.
12. Baev O.A., 2022. Raschety ustanovivsheysya svobodnoy fil'tratsii iz neoblitsovannykh kanalov [Calculations of steady free seepage from unlined canal]. Melioratsiya i gidrotekhnika [Land Reclamation and Hydraulic Engineering], vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 227-243, DOI: 10.31774/2712-9357-2022-12-3-227-243, EDN: TGXTOJ. (In Russian).
13. Ksenzov A.A., 2017. Melioratsiya zemel' i ekspluatatsiya meliorativnykh sistem v Nechernozemnoy zone Rossiyskoy Federatsii: sobr. nauch. i nauch.-metod. tr. [Land Reclamation and Operation of Reclamation Systems in the Non-Chernozem Zone of the Russian Federation: Coll. Scientific and Methodological Works]. In 7 vols., vol. 1, Tver, Tver State University, 461 p., EDN: XRAOEP. (In Russian).
14. Osadchiy S.D., Gerasimovich N.M., Musienko S.P., 2007. Analiz i podkhody k razrabotke proektnykh tekhnologicheskikh resheniy rekonstruktsii i remonta gidrotekhnicheskikh sooruzheniy [Analysis and approaches to the development of design technological solutions for the reconstruction and repair of hydraulic structures]. Gidrotekhnicheskoe stroitel'stvo [Power Technology and Engineering], no. 8, pp. 7-11, EDN: IASVFH. (In Russian).
Funding source: the study was conducted within the framework of State Assignment 125020401361-1.
