GULLY MODELING FOR FOREST RECLAMATION PURPOSES
- Land Reclamation, Recultivation, and Land Protection
Purpose: to study the formation of soybean yield and quality depending on changes in seeding rates and mineral nutrition in the Central Black Earth Region.
Materials and methods. The studies were conducted in the Kursk region in 2023–2025. The experimental design included four seeding rates: 0.4; 0.5; 0.6; 0.7 million viable seeds per 1 ha, with and without mineral fertilizers application (N₃₀P₃₀K₃₀). Soybeans were grown using the technology traditional for this region. Oil content and protein content in soybean grain were determined with an Infratec 1241 grain analyzer, and the grain nature was determined using a PH-1 liter grain tester. Mathematical processing was carried out using descriptive statistics and dispersion.
Results. When applying mineral fertilizers, plants in the first trifoliate leaf phase were 14–22 % taller than those in unfertilized crops, with their fresh weight increasing by 7–24 % and dry weight by 8–36 %, and the increase in leaf surface duration per plant was 1.1–6.1 sq. cm. The most developed plants in the first trifoliate leaf phase by all parameters were those in the variant with fertilizers and a seeding rate of 0.6 million viable seeds per 1 ha. Mineral fertilizer application at a dose of N₃₀P₃₀K₃₀ under soybean crops ensured a reliable increase in yield from 1.2 to 1.6 q/ha, and an increase in the seeding rate led to a tendency toward an increase in yield. The main influence on the change in yield was exerted by the application of mineral fertilizers (73 %). The seeding rate provided 17 % of the variation. The 1,000-kernel weight increased with increasing seeding rate.
Conclusions. The maximum yield over three years was obtained in the variants with fertilizers and seeding rates of 0.6 and 0.7 million units/ha, amounting to 28.5 and 28.7 q/ha, respectively. Soybean protein yield significantly increased with the use of fertilizers. With a one-unit change in the seeding rate, protein yield increased by 0.19 q/ha with fertilizer application and by 0.18 c/ha without it. Oil yield was high, amounting to 5.9–6.6 q/ha. Its increase of 5–8% was associated with the use of mineral fertilizers.
doi: 10.31774/2712-9357-2026-16-1-135-148
soybeans, fertilizer application, seeding rate, yield, protein, oil content, maximum yield increase
Deriglazova G. M., Semenenko E. А. Soybean yield and quality development depending on changes in seeding rates and mineral nutrition in the Central Black Earth Region. Land Reclamation and Hydraulic Engineering. 2026;16(1):135–148. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31774/2712-9357-2026-16-1-135-148.
1. Bushueva T.V., Borovik T.E., Stepanova T.N., Semenova N.N., 2011. Soya i yeye rol' v pitanii detey [Soybean and its role in children's nutrition]. Voprosy sovremennoy pediatrii [Current Pediatrics], vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 77-82, EDN: NEJYPJ. (In Russian).
2. Dubinkina E.A., Makarov M.R., Dudova E.V., 2024. Urozhaynost' i kachestvo zerna soi v zavisimosti ot obrabotki semyan i vegetiruyushchikh rasteniy mikrobiologicheskimi udobreniyami v usloviyakh TSCHR [Yield and quality of soybean grain depending on the treatment of seeds and vegetative plants with microbiological fertilizers under the conditions of the Central Black Earth Region]. Agrarnaya Rossiya [Agrarian Russia], no. 3, pp. 3-8, DOI: 10.30906/1999-5636-2024-3-3-8, EDN: ESQHFI. (In Russian).
3. Ibragimov A.D., 2015. Soya – kul'tura bol'shikh vozmozhnostey [Soybean is a culture of great opportunities]. Upravlenie, ekonomika, politika, sotsiologiya [Management, Economics, Politics, Sociology], no. 4, pp. 59-62, DOI: 10.24411/2412-2025-2015-00057, EDN: VVHXAR. (In Russian).
4. Deriglazova G., Minchenko Zh., 2024. Optimization of technological cultivation methods as a key to enhancing soybean productivity in the Kursk Region. E3S Web of Conferences. Vol. 548(2). X International Conference on Advanced Agritechnologies, Environmental Engineering and Sustainable Development (AGRITECH-X-2024), 01019, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202454801019.
5. Bulavintsev R.A., Golovin S.I., Stebakov V.A., Polokhin A.M., Volzhentsev A.V., Kozlov A.V., Pupavtsev I.E., Kravchenko T.S., 2023. Effektivnost' vozdelyvaniya soi v zavisimosti ot sposoba poseva i normy vyseva [Efficiency of soybean cultivation depending on the sowing method and seeding rate]. Vestnik agrarnoy nauki [Bulletin of Agrarian Science], no. 1(100), pp. 56-62, DOI: 10.17238/issn2587-666X.2023.1.56, EDN: XCQZKT. (In Russian).
6. Pushnya M.V., Balakhnina I.V., Kremneva O.Yu., Nesterova (Sobina) A.Yu., Snesareva E.G., 2023. Sevooborot kak sposob uvelicheniya bioraznoobraziya v agroekosistemakh, regulirovaniya chislennosti vrednykh fitofagov [Crop rotation as a way to increase biodiversity in agroecosystems, regulate the number of harmful phytophages]. Yug Rossii: ekologiya, razvitie [South of Russia: Ecology, Development], no. 2(67), pp. 113-126, DOI: 10.18470/1992-1098-2023-2-113-126, EDN: TAZYBH. (In Russian).
7. Svirina V.A., Chernogaev V.G., 2024. Vliyanie mineral'nogo pitaniya i predshe-stvennikov na urozhaynost' i kachestvo semyan soi v zvene sevooborota [Influence of mineral nutrition and predecessors on the yield and quality of soybean seeds in the crop rotation link]. Agrarnaya nauka [Agrarian Science], no. 380(3), pp. 124-128, DOI: 10.32634/0869-8155-2024-380-3-124-128, EDN: HSWJAT. (In Russian).
8. Zaitsev V.N., Zaitseva A.I., Mazalov V.I., 2016. Soya kak predshestvennik ozimykh kul'tur [Soybean as a predecessor of winter crops]. Zernobobovye i krupyanye kul'tury [Legumes and Groat Crops], no. 2(18), pp. 116-120, EDN: WDCRUZ. (In Russian).
9. Nikulchev K.A., 2019. Rol' predshestvennika v formirovanii urozhaynosti soi na fone dlitel'nogo primeneniya udobreniy [The role of the predecessor in the formation of soybean yield against the background of long-term fertilizer application]. Plodorodie [Fertility], no. 3(108), pp. 39-41, DOI: 10.25680/S19948603.2019.108.12, EDN: NJYXSL. (In Russian).
10. Dubovik D.V., Dubovik E.V., Shumakov A.V., Krivosheev S.I., 2023. Ekologicheskaya plastichnost', urozhaynost' i kachestvo zerna razlichnykh sortov soi v usloviyakh Kurskoy oblasti [Ecological plasticity, yield and grain quality of various soybean varieties in the Kursk region]. Rossiyskaya sel'skokhozyaystvennaya nauka [Russian Agricultural Science], no. 6, pp. 20-24, DOI: 10.31857/S2500262723060042, EDN: NNMTHV. (In Russian).
11. Svirina V.A., Chernogaev V.G., 2025. Intensivnaya tekhnologiya vozdelyvaniya soi na osnove ispol'zovaniya bakterial'nykh i mineral'nykh udobreniy [Intensive technology of soybean cultivation based on the use of bacterial and mineral fertilizers]. Agrarnaya nauka [Agrarian Science], no. 5, pp. 112-118, DOI: 10.32634/0869-8155-2025-394-05-112-118, EDN: NARHUL. (In Russian).
12. Mnatsakanyan A.A., Chuvarleeva G.V., Volkova A.S., Petelin I.S., 2023. Primenenie udobreniy dlitel'nogo perioda deystviya pri vyrashchivanii soi v usloviyakh Krasnodarskogo kraya [The use of fertilizers with a long period of action when growing soybeans under the conditions of the Krasnodar Territory]. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK [Achievements of Science and Technology in the Agro-Industrial Complex], vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 24-28, DOI: 10.53859/02352451_2023_37_7_24, EDN: ACZPPK. (In Russian).
13. Titova V.I., 2016. Osobennosti sistemy primeneniya udobreniy v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Particularities of the fertilizer application under modern conditions]. Agrokhimicheskiy vestnik [Agrochemical Bulletin], no. 1, pp. 2-7, EDN: TQXFPI. (In Russian).
14. Kabiru M.R., Buernor A.B., Dahhani S., Hafidi M., Jibrin J.M., Jemo M., 2024. Soybean yield variability and predictability from applied phosphorus sources and rhizobia inoculation in Northern Nigeria. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, vol. 8, 1428466, DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1428466, EDN: HELRZY.
15. Latifinia E., Eisvand H.R., 2022. Soybean physiological properties and grain quality responses to nutrients, and predicting nutrient deficiency using chlorophyll fluorescence. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1942-1954, DOI: 10.1007/s42729-022-00785-0, EDN: KVNCFW.
this work was conducted within the framework of the State Assignment no. FGZU-2026-0006 of the Kursk Federal Agrarian Research Center.