CROP GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND YIELD APPLYING AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGIES

Authors:Breskina Galina M., Masyutenko Nina P., Chuyan Natalia A., Klimov Artyom V.

631.559:633.1:631.89
Theme: General Agriculture, Crop Science
Views: 146

Annotation

Purpose: to study the influence of agrobiotechnology on the growth, development, crop structure and biological yield of crops in the grain-row crop rotation link.

Materials and methods. The studies were carried out in scientific and production experiment in 2022–2024 on slightly eroded typical chernozem (Kursk region, Medvensky district, Panino village). In the experiment, microbiological preparations (MBP) “Trichoplant, SK” and “Biogor-Zh” used to treat seeds, soil, crops and by-products were applied. Experiment options: 1) Control (generally accepted technology); 2) Chopped by-products (CP) of the crop; 3) CP + 10 kg of active ingredient N per 1 ton of straw (N); 4) CP + lime 1.5 t/ha; 5) PP + MBP (agrobiotechnology-1); 6) PP + MBP + N (agrobiotechnology-2); 7) PP + MBP + lime 1.5 t/ha (agrobiotechnology-3). Field experiments were carried out according to the State Variety Testing methodology.

Results. Inoculation of lupine and barley seeds with MBP increases field germination under unfavorable hydrothermal conditions by up to 40 and 16 %. Treatment of crops with MBP increased stress resistance of crops. During the dry period, the corn development did not stop, and by the period of formation of the 7–9th leaf, the maximum value of the plant height was noted when using agrobiotechnology-2 – 128.1 cm, which is significantly higher than the control by 35.8 cm at HSR₀₅ = 12.6 cm. After spring frosts, the barley crops treatment with MBP had a positive effect on the crop development. The use of agrobiotechnology-2 significantly increased the weight of one plant during the tillering period by 30 % compared to the control. The maximum yield of corn green mass – 40.74 t/ha and barley – 3.23 t/ha was revealed when applying agrobiotechnology-3, and lupine – 3.81 t/ha – agrobiotechnology-1.

Conclusions. Microbiological preparations “Trichoplant, SK” and “Biogor-Zh” have a positive effect on the growth and development of crops, but the effectiveness of microbiological preparations significantly depends on the hydrothermal conditions of the growing season.

doi: 10.31774/2712-9357-2025-15-2-297-318

Keywords

agrobiotechnology, field germination, growth, weight, yield, quality

For quoting

Breskina G. M., Masyutenko N. P., Chuyan N. A., Klimov A. V. Crop growth, development and yield applying agricultural biotechnologies. Land Reclamation and Hydraulic Engineering. 2025;15(2):297–318. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31774/2712-9357-2025-15-2-297-318.

Authors

G. M. Breskina – Senior Researcher, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Federal Agricultural Kursk Research Center, Kursk, Russian Federation, breskina-galina@yandex.ru, AuthorID: 280213, ORCID: 0000-0003-2381-312X;

N. P. Masyutenko – Chief Researcher, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor, Federal Agricultural Kursk Research Center, Kursk, Russian Federation, vninp@mail.ru, AuthorID: 81130, ORCID: 0000-0001-8348-0609;

N. A. Chuyan – Leading Researcher, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor, Federal Agricultural Kursk Research Center, Kursk, Russian Federation, natalia-chuyan@yandex.ru, AuthorID: 597312, ORCID: 0000-0002-4212-3143;

A. V. Klimov – Research Engineer, Federal Agricultural Kursk Research Center, Kursk, Russian Federation, artem_klimov_99@mail.ru, ORCID: 0009-0007-3447-2419.

Bibliography

1. Pavlyushin V.A., Novikov I.I., Boykova I.V., 2020. Mikrobiologicheskaya zashchita rastenii v tekhnologiyakh fitosanitarnoi optimizatsii agroehkosistem: teoriya i praktika (obzor) [Microbiological control in phytosanitary optimization technologies for agroecosystems: theory and practice (review)]. Sel'skokhozyaystvennaya biologiya [Agricultural Biology], vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 421-438, DOI: 10.15389/agrobiology.3.421rus, EDN: FEAOFP. (In Russian).

2. Skok S., Breus D., Almashova V., 2023. Assessment of the Effect of Biological Growth-Regulating Preparations on the Yield of Agricultural Crops under the Conditions of Steppe Zone. Journal of Ecological Engineering, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 135-144, DOI: 10.12911/22998993/163494, EDN: GGHAIJ.

3. Pavlovskaya N.E., Timakov A.G., Yakovleva I.V., Ageev N.Yu., 2019. Vliyanie posledstviya regulyatora rosta i biopreparata na posevnye kachestva yachmenya [The influence of the aftereffect of growth regulators and biologicals on sowing seed qualities of barley]. Vestnik agrarnoy nauki [Bullet. of Agrarian Science], no. 2(77), pp. 24-29, DOI: 10.15217/issn2587-666X.2019.2.24, EDN: AWSRGG. (In Russian).

4. Sergeev V.S., 2018. Semena, na start! [Seeds, on mark!]. Sel'skie uzory [Rural Patterns], no. 2, 6 p., EDN: LYGDPF. (In Russian).

5. Deriglazova G.M., Semenenko E.A., 2024. Vliyanie biopreparatov na rost i razvi-tie gorokha v pochvakh razlichnykh tipov [The influence of biopreparations on the growth and development of peas in different types of soils]. Melioratsiya i gidrotekhnika [Land Reclamation and Hydraulic Engineering], vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 322-336, аvailable: https://rosniipm-sm.ru/article?n=1489 [accessed 05.02.2025], DOI: 10.31774/2712-9357-2024-14-4-322-336, EDN: LUJWRT. (In Russian).

6. Sheshegova T.K., Shchekleina L.M., Starikov P.A., 2024. Vliyanie mikrobnoy inokulyatsii semyan na biokontrol' kornevykh gniley, biometriyu rasteniy i urozhaynost' yarovoy pshenitsy [Effect of microbial inoculation of seeds on root rot biocontrol, biometrical parameters and yield of spring wheat]. Tavricheskiy Vestnik Agrarnoy Nauki [Taurida Herald of the Agrarian Sciences], no. 1(37), pp. 187-197, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10930956, EDN: VRNNTW. (In Russian).

7. Rusakova I.V., 2021. Effektivnost' mikrobnykh destruktorov posleuborochnykh ostatkov v laboratornykh i polevykh eksperimentakh [Efficiency of microbial destructors of after harvest residues in laboratory and field experiments]. Vladimirsky Zemledelets [Vladimir Agricolist], no. 2(96), pp. 34-40, DOI: 10.24412/2225-2584-2021-2-34-40, EDN: XYMWKS. (In Russian).

8. Tikhonov A.V., Lobanova A.A., Sabirova T.P., Trushchenko A.A., 2024. Urozhaynost' i kachestvo zelenoy massy kukuruzy, vozdelyvaemoy po razlichnym tekhnologiyam [Productivity and quality of the green mass of corn cultivated using various technologies]. Kormoproizvodstvo [Forage Production], no. 1, pp. 29-35, DOI: 10.30906/1562-0417-2024-1-29-35, EDN: GQIFCB. (In Russian).

9. Kanatas P., Travlos I., Kakabouki I., Papastylianou P., Gazoulis I., 2020. Yield of organically grown maize hybrids as affected by two green manure crops in Greece. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 334-341, DOI: 10.4067/S0718-58392020000300334, EDN: UQNXID.

10. Vivien P.Á.L., Basal O., Erdős Z., Veres S., Zsombik L., 2021. Yield and yield components of white lupine under different ecological conditions. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 730-738, DOI: 10.33462/jotaf.899764, EDN: CZJPXL.

11. Akimenko A.S., Sviridov V.I., Dudkina T.A., Vavin V.G., Dolgopolova N.V., 2023. Obosnovanie napravleniya intensifikatsii proizvodstva zerna v sevooborotakh lesostepi Tsentral'nogo Chernozem'ya [Substantiation of the direction of grain production intensification in crop rotations of the forest-steppe of the Central Chernozem Region]. Zemledelie [Farming], no. 1, pp. 3-7, DOI: 10.24412/0044-3913-2023-1-3-7, EDN: GTMAGM. (In Russian).

12. Olenin O.A., Zudilin S.N., 2022. Elementy organicheskoy tekhnologii vozdely-vaniya yarovogo yachmenya v lesostepi Srednego Povolzh'ya [Elements of organic cultivation technology of spring barley in the Middle Volga region forest-steppe]. Agrarnyy vestnik Urala [Agrarian Bullet. of the Urals], no. 3(218), pp. 13-23, DOI: 10.32417/1997-4868-2022-218-03-13-23, EDN: VZVSKR. (In Russian).

13. Chuyan N.A., Masyutenko N.P., Breskina G.M., 2022. Vliyanie agrobiotekhnologii na produktivnost' zernovogo sevooborota [The influence of biologization of agriculture on the productivity of grain-rowed crop rotation]. Vestnik rossiyskoy sel'skokhozyaystvennoy nauki [Bullet. of Russian Agricultural Science], no. 4, pp. 68-73, DOI: 10.31857/2500-2082/2022/4/68-73, EDN: BJQBOP. (In Russian).

14. Chuyan N., Breskina G., Priputneva M., Okuneva A., 2021. Productivity of a cereal-row crop rotation in the context of an applied biologization practice. III International scientific and practical conference, June 28–30, 2021 “Problems and Prospects of Scientific and Innovative Support of the Agro-Industrial Complex of the Regions 2021”, EDP Sciences, vol. 32, Article number: 02013, 4 p., DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20213202013, EDN: ORSPGV.

15. Eremina R.F., Mashchenko S.S., Chuyan N.A., Fedorchenko A.E., Ermakova A.A., 2005. Tekhnologiya poverkhnostnogo kompostirovaniya rastitel'nykh ostatkov [The technology of surface composting of plant residues]. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK [Achievements of Science and Technology of the Agro-Industrial Complex], no. 1, pp. 18-20, (In Russian).

16. Breskina G.M., 2024. Urozhaynost' lyupina belogo pri primenenii agrobiotekhno-logiy [Yield of white lupine when applying agrobiotechnology]. Sovremennye tekhnologii sel'skokhozyaystvennogo proizvodstva: sb. nauch. st. po materialam XXVII mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakt. konferentsii [Modern Technologies of Agricultural Production: Collect. of Scientific Articles Based on the Proceed. of the XXVII International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Grodno, GGAU, pp. 47-50, EDN: SMAOPN. (In Russian).