GULLY MODELING FOR FOREST RECLAMATION PURPOSES
- Land Reclamation, Recultivation, and Land Protection
Purpose: to determine the impact of phosphogypsum rates in combination with organic matter on the properties of integrated cover soils, their productivity, and also to substantiate the economic feasibility of their application for chemical reclamation during irrigation.
Materials and methods. The studies were carried out in the Martynovsky district Rostov region for 4 years on the integrated cover soils according to the scheme of the experiment, including the application of phosphogypsum (Ph) and organic matter (OM) at certain rates. The studies were carried out according to generally accepted methods.
Results. It has been stated that the phosphogypsum application at 10 t/ha rate contributed to the southern chernozem desalination up to 3 % sodium from the total soil-absorbing complex and an calcium and magnesium increase to the optimal parameters for this soil. On the solonetz, the content of exchangeable sodium decreased to 9–8 % in the variants with 10 t/ha Ph rate. In the variant with 5 t/ha Ph rate, the process of soil salinization proceeded somewhat more slowly, which is associated with an insufficient ameliorant rate for the solonetz. The accumulation of humus to the greatest extent was observed in the variant 10 t/ha Ph + 40 t/ha OM. After 4 years, it amounted to 0.24 % on the southern chernozem, and 0.19 % on the solonetz. Both soils included in the complex decompacted, and in the better option, the southern chernozem density was 1.17 t/m³, and on the solonetz – 1.20 t/m³. The soil properties improvement contributed to the increase in productivity. By the 4th year of the aftereffect of ameliorants, it increased by 73–85 % on the southern chernozem and by 69–79 % on solonetz compared with the control. The average productivity for 4 years of research on the southern chernozem ranged from 7.18 (5 t/ha Ph + 40 t/ha OM) to 8.03 t grain units/ha (10 t/ha Ph + 40 t/ha OM), and in the control 4.82 t grain units/ha. On the solonetz, respectively, it increased from 6.03 to 6.93 t grain units/ha, in the control – 4.30 t grain units/ha.
Conclusions: the application of phosphogypsum with organic matter provides both reclamative and economic effect on solonetz integrated cover soils.
doi: 10.31774/2712-9357-2022-12-4-1-19
phosphogypsum, organics, irrigation, application rate, efficiency, productivity
Dokuchayeva L. M., Yurkova R. Ye., Babichev A. N. The efficiency of phosphogypsum application with organics for integrated cover soils during irrigation. Land Reclamation and Hydraulic Engineering. 2022;12(4):1–19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31774/2712-9357-2022-12-4-1-19.
1. Skuratov N.S., Shalashova O.Yu., Lozanovskaya I.N., Dokuchaeva L.M., Usanina T.V., 2005. Melioratsiya solonzovykh pochv v usloviyakh orosheniya [Reclamation of Alkaline Soils under Irrigation]. Novocherkassk, NOK Publ., 180 p. (In Russian).
2. Kallas E.V., Maron T.A., 2018. Melioratsiya zasolennykh pochv i metody ikh izucheniya: uchebno-metod. posobie [Reclamation of Saline Soils and Methods of their Study: textbook]. Tomsk, Tomsk University, 138 p. (In Russian).
3. Meliorativnyy kompleks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: inform. izd. [Land Reclamation Complex of the Russian Federation: inform. ed.]. Moscow, Rosinformagrotekh Publ., 2020, 304 p. (In Russian).
4. Dokuchaeva L.M., Yurkova R.E., Shalashova O.Yu., 2016. O pravilakh provedeniya meropriyatiy po khimicheskoy melioratsii pochv [On the rules for carrying out measures for chemical soil reclamation]. Puti povysheniya effektivnosty oroshaemogo zemledeliya [Ways of Increasing the Efficiency of Irrigated Agriculture], no. 4(64), pp. 177-182. (In Russian).
5. Priemy povysheniya plodorodiya pochv (izvestkovanie, fosforitovanie, gipsovanie): nauchno-metod. rekomendatsii [Techniques for Increasing Soil Fertility (Liming, Phosphoritizing, Gypsuming): scientific method. recommendations]. Moscow, Rosinformagrotekh Publ., 2021, 116 p. (In Russian).
6. Gosudarstvennyy doklad o sostoyanii i ispol'zovanii zemel' v Rossiyskoy Federatsii v 2019 godu [State Report on the State and Use of Land in the Russian Federation in 2019]. Moscow, 2020, 206 p. (In Russian).
7. Grebenshchikova E.A., Yust N.A., Pykhteeva M.A., 2016. Vliyanie khimicheskoy melioratsii putem vneseniya zoloshlakovykh otkhodov na fiziko-khimicheskie svoystva pochvy [The influence of chemical melioration on physical and chemical properties of the soil by introduction of ash waste]. Vestnik KrasGAU [Bull. of KrasGAU], no. 6, pp. 3-8. (In Russian).
8. Fomenko T.G., Popova V.P., Chernikov E.A., 2018. Vliyanie khimicheskoy melioratsii na fiziko-khimicheskie svoystva chernozemnykh pochv oroshaemykh plodovykh pitomnikov [Effect of chemical melioration on the physico-chemical properties of the black soil of irrigated fruit nursery]. Rossiyskaya sel'skokhozyaystvennaya nauka [Russian Agricultural Science], no. 2, pp. 44-49. (In Russian).
9. Babichev A.N., Dokuchaeva L.M., Yurkova R.E., 2020. [Factors enhancing the adverse effects of long-term irrigation on the ordinary chernozem properties]. Nauchnyy zhurnal Rossiyskogo NII problem melioratsii, no. 4(40), pp. 1-22, available: http:www.rosniipm-sm.ru/article?n=1156 [accessed 15.06.2022], DOI: 10.31774/2222-1816-2020-4-1-22. (In Russian).
10. Kalinichenko V.P., 2017. Effektivnoe ispol'zovanie fosfogipsa v zemledelii [Effective use of phosphogypsum in agriculture]. Pitanie rasteniy [Plant Nutrition], no. 1, pp. 2-33. (In Russian).
11. Nekrasov R.V., Akanova N.I., Sheudzhen A.Kh., Vizirskaya M.M., 2019. Perspektivy primeneniya fosfogipsa kak khimicheskogo melioranta v zemledelii Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Prospects for the phosphogypsum application in agriculture of the Russian Federation as a chemical ameliorant]. Mezhdunarodnyy sel'skokhozyaystvennyy zhurnal [International Agricultural Journal], no. 6(372), pp. 93-98, DOI: 10.24411/2587-6740-2019-16115. (In Russian).
12. Dokuchaeva L.M., Yurkova R.E., Shalashova O.Yu., 2012. [The phosphogypsum and phosphogypsum-containing ameliorants application for solonetz reclamation under irrigation]. Nauchnyy zhurnal Rossiyskogo NII problem melioratsii, no. 3(07), pp. 52-64, available: http:www.rosniipm-sm.ru/archive?n=113&id=116 [accessed 16.06.2022]. (In Russian).
13. Michalovicz L., Tormena C.A., Müller M.M.L., Dick W.A., Cervi E.C., 2021. Residual effects of phosphogypsum rates and machinery traffic on soil attributes and common-bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) yield in a no-tillage system. Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 213, 105152, https: doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105152.
14. Duart V.M., Garbuio F.J., Caires E.F., 2021. Does direct-seeded rice performance improve upon lime and phosphogypsum use? Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 212, 105055, https: doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105055.
15. Zonal'nye sistemy zemledeliya Rostovskoy oblasti (na period 2013–2020 gg.) [Zonal Farming Systems of Rostov Region (for the period 2013–2020)]. In 3 parts, pt. 1, Ministry of Agriculture and Food of Rostov Region, Rostov-on-Don, 2012, 234 p. (In Russian).
16. Kulik G.V. [et al.], 1987. Spravochnik po planirovaniyu i ekonomike sel'skokhozyaystvennogo proizvodstva [Handbook of Planning and Economics of Agricultural Production]. 2nd ed., pt. 1, Moscow, Rosselkhozizdat Publ., 512 p. (In Russian).
17. Krasnoshchekov V.N., Olgarenko G.V., Olgarenko D.G., 2016. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po otsenke ekologo-ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti investitsionnykh proektov melioratsii zemel' sel'skokhozyaystvennogo naznacheniya [Guidelines for the Assessment of Ecological and Economic Efficiency of Investment Projects of Land Reclamation for Agricultural Purposes]. Kolomna, 97 p. (In Russian).
18. Shchedrin V.N., Balakay G.T., Dokuchaeva L.M., Yurkova R.E., Shalashova O.Yu., Tabala G.I., 2017. Rukovodstvo po kontrolyu i regulirovaniyu pochvennogo plodorodiya oroshaemykh zemel' [Guidelines for Irrigated Land Soil Fertility Control and Regulation]. Novocherkassk, RosNIIPM, 137 p. (In Russian).