Annotation

Purpose: justification of the applicability of various methods of hydraulic calculations of irrigation canals of land reclamation systems. It is recommended to use five types of hydraulic tasks allowing determining the following main parameters of irrigation canals for each type: conveying capacity (first type), canal slope (second type), roughness coefficient (third type), water flow depth (fourth type), cross-section dimensions of the irrigation canal (fifth type). Materials and methods. The well-known classical methods and dependences of N. N. Pavlovsky, B. A. Bakhmetev, R. R. Chugaev, A. A. Agroskin, Shezi and other scientists were taken as a basis during the research. 

Results. Methods for determining the main hydraulic characteristics of irrigation canals, including: canal discharge and slope and roughness coefficient are considered. These methods allow making calculations by the selection and graphical methods. The fifth type of problems is a series of independent solutions, where the effective width also calculated graphically is used. An analysis of the calculation results shows that for problems of the first type, the Chezy coefficients and hydraulic discharge decrease with an increase in the channel roughness coefficient values. Based on the calculated data obtained, canal discharge change chart depending on the roughness coefficient of the channel was constructed.

Conclusions. The conditions for application of various methods of hydraulic calculation of irrigation canals were determined based on the results of the research. The values of the roughness coefficients of irrigation canals in impervious lining – concrete monolithic and reinforced concrete from prefabricated slabs are given. Summary calculation results for six different examples are presented.

doi: 10.31774/2712-9357-2023-13-3-274-295

For quoting

Baev O. A. Justification of hydraulic calculation methods for irrigation canals. Land Reclamation and Hydraulic Engineering. 2023;13(3):274–295. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31774/2712-9357-2023-13-3-274-295.

Bibliography

1. Bogomolov A.I., Mikhailov K.A., 1972. Gidravlika [Hydraulics]. 2nd ed., rev. and add., Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 648 p. (In Russian).

2. Dolgushev I.A., 1975. Povyshenie ekspluatatsionnoy nadezhnosti orositel'nykh kanalov [Improving the Operational Reliability of Irrigation Canals]. Moscow, Kolos Publ., 136 p. (In Russian).

3. Chow V.T., 1969. Gidravlika otkrytykh kanalov [Open-Channel Hydraulics]. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 464 p. (In Russian). 

4. Rylova I.A., Borovkov V.S., 2013. Ekvivalentnaya sherokhovatost' napornykh i beznapornykh vodovodov [Equivalent roughness of pressure and pressure-free conduits]. Vestnik MGSU [Bulletin of MGSU], no. 4, pp. 181-187. (In Russian).

5. Akhmedova N.R., Naumov V.A., 2021. Vliyanie izmeneniya koeffitsiyenta sherokhovatosti rusla na maksimal'nye raschetnye urovni malogo vodotoka v zadannom stvore (na primere r. Nel'ma) [Influence of the channel roughness factor change on the maximal design levels of a small watercourse in a given river cross (Nelma river example). Vestnik Inzhenernoy shkoly Dal'nevostochnogo federal'nogo universiteta [FEFU: School of Engineering Bulletin], no. 4(49), pp. 74-80, DOI: 10.24866/2227-6858/2021-4/74-8. (In Russian).

6. Verbitsky V.S., Khodzinskaya A.G., 2018. Privedennye gidravlicheskie soprotivleniya rek i kanalov [Integrated hydraulic resistance of rivers and canals]. Gidrotekhnicheskoe stroitel'stvo [Power Technology and Engineering], no. 3, pp. 37-47. (In Russian).

7. Kosichenko Yu.M., Baev O.A., 2020. Gidravlicheskaya effektivnost' orositel'nykh kanalov pri ekspluatatsii [Hydraulic efficiency of irrigation channels in the course of operation]. Vestnik MGSU [MGSU Bulletin], vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1147-1162, DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2020.8.1147-1162. (In Russian).

8. Baev O.A., Kosichenko Yu.M., 2019. [Features of hydraulic conditions of large canals operation]. Ekologiya i vodnoe khozyaystvo, no. 3(03), pp. 145-160, available: http:rosniipm-sm1.ru/article?n=43 [accessed 24.05.2023], https:doi.org/10.31774/2658-7890-2019-3-145-160. (In Russian).

9. Gladkov G.L., 2020. Issledovanie zernistoy sherokhovatosti dna rechnykh rusel [Studying the granular roughness of river channels bottom]. Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova [Bulletin of Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping], vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 336-346, DOI: 10.21821/2309-5180-2020-12-2-336-346. (In Russian).

10. Benovitsky E.L., 1988. Vyvod raschetnykh zavisimostey dlya koeffitsienta sherokhovatosti chastichno zarosshikh rusel [Derivation of the calculated dependencies for the roughness coefficient of a partially overgrown channel]. Vodnye resursy [Water Resources], no. 1, pp. 68-74. (In Russian).

11. Belavkin A.V., 2019. Analiz sushchestvuyushchikh podkhodov k otsenke dvizheniya potoka vody v zarosshikh ruslakh [Analysis of existing approaches to the assessment of the water flow in weedy beds]. Innovatsii i investitsii [Innovations and Investments], no. 4, pp. 229-233. (In Russian).

12. Kosichenko Yu.M., 2011. [Influence of operational factors on the earth channels carrying capacity]. Nauchnyy zhurnal Rossiyskogo NII problem melioratsii, no. 3(03), 13 p., available: http:rosniipm-sm.ru/dl_files/udb_files/udb13-rec43-field6.pdf [accessed 24.05.2023]. (In Russian).

13. Tkachev A.A., Gurin K.G., 2021. Gidravlicheskie raschety lotka bystrotoka Novotroitskogo vodokhranilishcha [Hydraulic calculations of the fast-flow flume of the Novotroitsk reservoir]. Melioratsiya i vodnoe khozyaystvo: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakt. konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 145-letiyu obrazovaniya “Donleskhoza” [Land Reclamation and Water Management: Proc. of All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference, Dedicated to the 145th Anniversary of the Formation of “Donleskhoz”]. Novocherkassk, pp. 104-109. (In Russian).

14. Huai W.X., Zhang J., Wang W.J., Katul G.G., 2019. Turbulence structure in open channel flow with partially covered artificial emergent vegetation. Journal of Hydrology, no. 573, pp. 180-193, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.071.

15. Suljić N., 2021. Influence of roughty of a rectangular open channel on flow speeds and water flow. Technical Institute Bijeljina, Archives for Technical Sciences, vol. 24, pp. 57-64, DOI: 10.7251/afts.2021.1324.057.

16. Rustem E., Yestaev K., Abdimomynova M., Abduvalova A., Tassybayev A., 2021. Study of new designs of spillway channels with artificial roughness. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 117-133, DOI: 10.21533/pen.v9i4.2303.

17. Silva Filho J.A.S. [et al.], 2019. Drag coefficient and hydraulic roughness generated by an aquatic vegetation patch in a semiarid alluvial channel. Ecological Engineering, vol. 141, article number: 105598, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105598.

18. Huang P.C., Lee K.T., 2020. Channel hydrological response function considering inflow conditions and hydraulic characteristics. Journal of Hydrology, vol. 591, article number: 125546, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125546.

19. Naghavi M., Mohammadi M., Mahtabi G., 2022. An experimental evaluation of the blocks in floodplain on hydraulic characteristics of flow in a meandering compound channel. Journal of Hydrology, vol. 612, article number: 127976, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127976