Annotation

Purpose: to substantiate the main provisions of landscape agroforestry reclamation. 

Methods: landscape-chorionic, ecotonic and catenary-basin approaches. 

Results. A provision on the forest agrarian chorion formed by the core – the phytomass accumulation of the forestry stows and the reclamation fields of its impact on the agricultural landscape has been developed. The characteristics of these fields depend on the intensity of the material-energy manifestations of the chorionic core, which changes in connection with the agro-environment dynamics and the forest-agrarian chorion development. This leads to the emergence of local forest-agricultural landscapes and their ecotones. Forestry stows mesoecotones of and regional forests macroecotones organize the landscape space. In this case, the slope landscapes combine landscape-geochemical flows, and the catchment areas of gullies and watercourse basins combine the systems of such flows. Forest agrarian chorions, due to their influence fields and filtration-barrier function of ecotones, influence the direction and properties of landscape-geochemical flows, changing the ratio of the articles of the water balance of the territory, material-energy removal and accumulation of matter and energy, concentration and dispersion of information, productivity and product quality of agricultural landscapes. Primary catchments of gullies with a well-developed network of valleys, hollows and gullies are characterized by landscape-geochemical microarens, and the basins of watercourses of various orders are mega- and macroarens, which, respectively, represent local forest-agricultural landscapes, districts, regions, and zones of landscape agroforestry reclamation. All forest agrarian chorions (forest strips, groves, etc.) are grouped according to the main criteria: protection of fields and gardens, protection of meadows and pastures, organization of landscape space. 

Conclusions. The terminology and meanings of agroforestry reclamation and landscape science have been agreed upon. The main provisions of landscape agroforestry have been substantiated: forest agrarian chorion, forest edge ecotone, basin structure and qualitatively homogeneous groups of multifunctional forest agrarian chorions. 

doi: 10.31774/2712-9357-2021-11-3-54-77

For quoting

Ivonin V. M., Voskoboinikova I. V. Landscape agroforestry reclamation // Land Reclamation and Hydraulic Engineering [Electronic resource]. 2021. Vol. 11, no 3. P. 54–77. URL: http:www.rosniipm-sm.ru/en/article?n=1214 (date of access: 18.08.2021). doi: 10.31774/2712-9357-2021-11-3-54-77

Bibliography

1. Isachenko A.G., 1991. Landshaftovedenie i fiziko-geograficheskoe rayonirovanie: uchebnik dlya geograficheskikh spetsialnostey universitetov [Landscape Science and Physical-Geographical Regionalization: Textbook for geographical specialities of universities]. Moscow, Higher School Publ., 365 p. (In Russian).

2. Troll K., 1972. Landshaftnaya ekologiya (geoekologiya) i biogeotsenologiya: terminologicheskoe issledovanie [Landscape ecology (geoecology) and biogeocenology: terminological research]. Izvestiya AN SSSR. Seriya geograficheskaya [Bull. of Academy of Science of the USSR. Geographic Series], no. 3, pp. 114-120. (In Russian).

3. Forman R.T.T., Gordon M., 1986. Landscape Ecology. New York, Wiley Publ., 332 p.

4. Meier A.L., Boom B., Davis A., Gagné S.A., Loudermilk E.L., Scheller R.M., Schmiegelow F.K.A., Wiersma Y.F., Franklin J., 2016. How landscape ecology informs global climate change science and policy. BioScience, June 1, vol. 66, iss. 6, pp. 458-469, https:doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw035.

5. Horoshev A.V., Puzachenko Yu.G., Dyakonov K.N., 2006. Sovremennoe sostoyanie landshaftnoy ekologii [Modern state of landscape ecology]. Izvestiya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Seriya geograficheskaya [Bull. of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Geographic Series], no. 5, pp. 12-21. (In Russian).

6. Newton A.C., Hill R.A., Echeverría C., Golicher D., Rey Benayas J.M., Cayuela L., Hinsley S.A., 2009. Remote sensing and the future of landscape ecology. Progress in Physical Geography, no. 33(4), pp. 528-546, available: http:www3.uah.es/josemrey/Reprints/Newton_RemoteSensing_PIPG_2009.pdf [accessed 12.04.2021], DOI: 10.1177/0309133309346882. 

7. Mirzekhanova Z.G., 2001. Ekologicheskiy karkas territorii v strategii ustoychivogo razvitiya: analiz podkhodov, naznachenie, soderzhanie [Ecological framework of the territory in the strategy of sustainable development: analysis of approaches, purpose, content]. Geografiya i prirodnye resursy [Geography and Natural Resources], no. 2, pp. 154-158. (In Russian).

8. Morozov G.F., 1904. O tipakh nasazhdeniy i ikh znachenii v lesovodstve [On the types of plantations and their significance in forestry]. Lesnoy zhurnal [Forest Journal], no. 1, pp. 6-25. (In Russian).

9. Kireev D.M., 2012. Lesnoe landshaftovedenie: tekst lektsiy [Forest Landscape Science: text of lectures]. Saint Petersburg, SPbGLTU Publ., 328 p. (In Russian).

10. Kozmenko A.S., 1954. Osnovy protivoerozionnoy melioratsii [Fundamentals of Erosion Preventive Reclamation]. Moscow, Selkhozgiz Publ., 424 p. (In Russian).

11. Ivonin V.M., 2017. [Substantiation of forestry reclamation system of natural-anthropogenic landscapes]. Nauchnyy Zhurnal Rossiyskogo NII Problem Melioratsii, no. 3(27), pp. 18-31, available: http:www.rosniipm-sm.ru/article?n=280 [accessed 12.04.2021]. (In Russian).

12. Yurtaev A.A., 2011. Agrolandshaftnye issledovaniya: teoriya i praktika [Agrolandscape research: theory and practice]. Nauchnye vedomosti. Seriya: Estestvennye nauki [Scientific Bull. Series: Natural Sciences], no. 15(110), iss. 16, pp. 217-221. (In Russian).

13. Rey Benayas M.J., Altamirano A., Miranda A., Catalán G., Prado M., Lisón F., Bullock J.M., 2020. Landscape restoration in a mixed agricultural-forest catchment: Planning a buffer strip and hedgerow network in a Chilean biodiversity hotspot. Ambio. Environment and Society Journal, vol. 49, pp. 310-323, DOI: 10.1007/s13280-019-01149-2.

14. Marull J., Otero I., Stefanescu C., Tello E., Miralles M., Coll F., Pons M., Diana G.L., 2015. Exploring the links between forest transition and landscape changes in the Mediterranean. Does forest recovery really lead to better landscape quality? Agroforestry Systems, pp. 1-15, DOI: 10.1007/s10457-015-9808-8. 

15. Ivonin V.M., Voskoboinikova I.V., Matvienko E.Yu., 2018. Theoretical concept of adaptive forestland reclamation of agricultural landscapes. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, vol. 9, no. 13, pp. 95-103, available: http:www.iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/Journal_uploads/IJCIET/VOLUME_9_ISSUE_13/IJCIET_09_13_009.pdf [accessed 12.04.2021].

16. Retyum A.Yu., 1988. Zemnye miry [Terrestrial Worlds]. Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 268 p. (In Russian).

17. Solovyova V.V., 2014. Chto takoe “ekoton”? [What is “ecotone”?]. Samarskiy nauchnyy vestnik [Samara Scientific Bulletin], no. 2(7), pp. 116-119. (In Russian).

18. Bobra T.V., 2009. Novye ob"ekty landshaftnykh issledovaniy [New objects of landscape research]. Geopolitika i ekogeodinamika regionov [Geopolitics and Ecogeodynamics of Regions], vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 20-32, available: http:geopolitika.cfuv.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/04bobra.pdf [accessed 12.04.2021]. (In Russian).

19. Scarciglia F., Conforti M., Buttafuoco G., Robustelli G., Aucelli P.P.C., Morrone F., Casuscelli F., Palumbo G., 2012. Integrated study of a soil catena in the Turbolo watershed (Calabria, southern Italy): Soil processes, hydrology and geomorphic dynamics. Rendiconti Online Societa Geologica Italiana, Jan., vol. 21, pp. 1215-1217.

20. Golovanov A.I., Kozhanov E.S., Sukharev Yu.I., 2015. Landshaftovedenie: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Landscape Science: textbook for universities]. 2nd ed., rev. and supp. Saint Petersburg, Lan' Publ., 224 p. (In Russian).

21. Milkov F.N., 1981. Basseyn reki kak paradinamicheskaya landshaftnaya sistema i voprosy prirodopol'zovaniya [River basin as a paradynamic landscape system and natural research management issues]. Geografiya i prirodnye resursy [Geography and Natural Resources], no. 4, pp. 11-18. (In Russian).

22. Kuzmenko Ya.V., Lisetskiy F.N., Narozhnyaya A.G., 2012. Primenenie basseynovoy kontseptsii prirodopol'zovaniya dlya pochvovodookhrannogo obustroystva agrolandshaftov [Application of the basin concept of environmental management for soil-water protection of agricultural landscapes]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Bull. of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences], vol. 14, no. 1(9), pp. 2432-2435. (In Russian).

23. Ivonin V.M., 2019. [Forest landscape reclamation potential analysis]. Nauchnyy Zhurnal Rossiyskogo NII Problem Melioratsi, no. 2(34), pp. 51-67, available: http:www.rosniipm-sm.ru/en/archive?n=587&id=591 [accessed 12.04.2021], DOI: 10.31774/2222-1816-2019-2-51-67. (In Russian).

24. Ivonin V.M., 2020. [The study of zones of reclamation influence of forest management stow in natural anthropogenic landscapes]. Nauchnyy Zhurnal Rossiyskogo NII Problem Melioratsii, no. 4(40), pp. 122-144, available: http:www.rosniipm-sm.ru/article?n=1163 [accessed 12.04.2021], DOI: 10.31774/2222-1816-2020-4-122-144. (In Russian).

25. Glazovskaya M.A., 2002. Geokhimicheskie osnovy tipologii i metodiki issledovaniy prirodnykh landshaftov [Geochemical Foundations for Typology and Research Methods of Natural Landscapes]. 2nd ed., Smolensk, Oikumena Publ., 288 p. (In Russian).

26. Bevz V.N., Gorbunov A.S., Bykovskaya O.P., 2017. Strukturno-funkcional'noe zonirovanie territorii kak metod optimizatsii landshaftov (na primere Kalachskoy lesostepi) [Structurally functional zoning of the territory as a method for optimizing landscapes (on the example of the Kalach steppe forest)]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Geografiya [Bull. of Voronezh State University. Series: Geography. Geoecology], no. 2, pp. 49-58. (In Russian).

27. Abakumova L.I. [et al.], 2004. Entsiklopediya agrolesomelioratsii [Encyclopedia of Agroforestry]. Volgograd, VNIALMI, 675 p. (In Russian).

28. Bogdanova M.D., Gavrilova I.P., Gerasimova M.I., 2012. Elementarnye landshafty kak ob"ekty landshaftno-geokhimicheskogo kartografirovaniya [Elementary landscapes as objects of landscape-geochemical mapping]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Geografiya [Bull. of Moscow University. Series 5. Geography], no. 1, pp. 23-28. (In Russian).

29. Turchin T.Ya., Korobova Ya.V., 2014. Landshaftnye osnovy izucheniya poymennykh lesov Stepnogo Pridon'ya [Landscape foundations of the study of floodplain forests of the Steppe Don river region]. Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Bull. of Altai State Agrarian University], no. 7(117), pp. 70-74. (In Russian).

30. Ivonin V.M., 2018. Lesomelioratsiya landshaftov. Lesnye nasazhdeniya dlya uluchsheniya funktsionirovaniya, sokhraneniya i rekul'tivatsii prirodno-antropogennykh landshaftov: uchebnik [Forest Reclamation of Landscapes. Forest Plantations to Improve Functioning, Preservation and Reclamation of Natural and Anthropogenic Landscapes: Textbook]. Novocherkassk, Lik Publ., 206 p. (In Russian).