The aim of the study is to search for methods to assess the efficiency of using regulatory documentation in the field of land reclamation. As part of the research, foreign and Russian practices of assessing the economic efficiency of applying standards in various sectors of the economy were studied. As a result of the study it was found that the Cobb – Douglas production function adjusted with consideration of contribution of scientific and technological progress is used to assess the impact of availability of a package of regulations including standards and normative and methodological documentation in various sectors of the national economy of a particular state on economic growth. The economic efficiency of regulatory documentation is expressed in saving resources used in production activities, improving product quality, improving production and operating conditions, reducing cases of employment injuries, and revenue growth due to increased competitiveness of standardized goods, works and services in global and domestic sales markets. Evaluation of the economic efficiency of standardization is based on the method of comparative analysis of various indicators measured without the use of the document being studied (a package of documents) and with its application. Such indicators as cost, labor productivity, changes in operating, material and financial costs, etc. are included as a part of fixed characteristics. The economic efficiency is determined taking into account the rate of development of various sectors of the national economy and a retrospective analysis of exogenous and endogenous political and socio-economic factors.
The conclusion is made that the results of the study can be used by analogy of application in assessing the economic effects of the normative and methodological documentation application in the field of land reclamation.
Key words: standardization; regulatory documentation; economic efficiency; national standards; Cobb – Douglas production function; scientific and technological progress; labor productivity.
DOI: 10.31774/2222-1816-2020-1-169-182
Shchedrin, V. N. International experience in determining economic efficiency regulating documentation in national economy industry / V. N. Shchedrin, S. A. Manzhina, P. D. Vaneyeva // Scientific Journal of Russian Scientific Research Institute of Land Improvement Problems [Electronic resource]. – 2020. – ? 1(37). – P. 169–182. – Mode of access: http:www.rosniipm-sm.ru/en/archive?n=635&id=646. – DOI: 10.31774/2222-1816-2020-1-169-182.
1 Aronov I.Z., Il’ina E.V., Zazhigalkin A.V., 2014. Otsenka effektivnosti natsional'noy standartizatsii [Assessing the efficiency of national standardization]. Standarty i kachestvo [Standards and Quality], no. 3(921), pp. 24-28, available: https:ria-stk.ru/stq/adetail.php?ID=81519, the full version of the article is available to subscribers of the electronic journal. (In Russian).
2 Martynenko T.S., Meshchanov G.I., 2016. Ekonomicheskie preimushchestva standartizatsii pri vykhode na mezhdunarodnyy rynok po materialam doklada na 68-om obshchem sobranii Assotsiatsii “Elektrokabel'” [The economic benefits of standardization when entering the international market based on the report made at the 68th general meeting of the Electrocable Association]. Kabeli i provoda [Cables and Wires], no. 5(360), pp. 14-18. (In Russian).
3 Aronov I.Z., Kostyleva E.V., 2019. Standardization as an effective channel of diffusion of innovations. Communications in Dependability and Quality Management, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 18-26.
4 Schedrin V.N., Slabunov V.V., 2011. [Principles and approaches to the formation of normative base of the reclamation complex of Russia]. Nauchnyy Zhurnal Rossiyskogo NII Problem Melioratsii, no. 3(03), available: http:rosniipm-sm.ru/dl_files/udb_files/udb13-rec39-field6.pdf. (In Russian).
5 Blind K., 2001. The impacts of innovations and standards on trade of measurement and testing products: Empirical results of Switzerland's bilateral trade flows with Germany, France and the UK. Information Economics and Policy, no. 13, pp. 439-460, DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6245(01)00047-6.
6 Kirichenko L.A., Samoilenko L.A., 2012. Standartizatsiya i sertifikatsiya tovarov i uslug: uchebnik [Standardization and Certification of Goods and Services: a textbook]. Kiev, Ranok Publ., 240 p. (In Russian).
7 Swann G.M.P., 2000. The Economics of Standardisation: Final Report for Standards and Technical Regulations Directorate Department of Trade and Industry [Electronic resource]. Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, 57 ?., available: http:assalweb.org/assal_nueva/documentos/Estandares/file11312.pdf [accessed 2019].
8 Economic Benefits of Standardisation. Summary of Results. Final Report and Practical Examples [Electronic resource]. DIN German Institute for Standardisation, 2000, 39 p., available: https:pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4b2b/dc734f32afd2882ee33d308da8a5b34f4-7ff.pdf [accessed 2019].
9 Gerundino D., Weissinger R., 2011. Economic Benefits of Standards. International Case Studies, vol. 1. ISO [Electronic resource]. Geneva, 303 ?., available: https:iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/archive/pdf/en/pub100288.pdf [accessed 2019].
10 Economic Benefits of Standards. International Case Studies, vol. 2. ISO [Electronic resource]. Geneva, 2012, 343 ?., available: https:iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/archive/pdf/en/pub100311.pdf [accessed 2019].
11 Blind K., Jungmittag A., Mangelsdorf ?., 2011. The Economic Benefits of Standardisation. An update of the study carried out by DIN in 2000 [Electronic resource]. DIN German Institute for Standardisation, 24 ?., available: https:din.de/blob/89552/68849fab0eeeaafb56c5a3ffee9959c5/economic-benefits-of-standardi-zation-en-data.pdf [accessed 2019].
12 Swann G.M.P., 2010. The Economics of Standardization: An Update. Report for the UK Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) [Electronic resource]. Innovative Economics Limited, 78 ?., available: http:citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.618.5922&rep=rep1&type=pdf [accessed 2019].
13 Miotti H., 2009. The Economic Impact of Standardization. Technological Change, Standards Growth in France [Electronic resource]. AFNOR Publ., 36 p., available: https:normalisation.afnor.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Etude-Impact-EcoNorm-GB2009.pdf [accessed 2019].
14 Stokes F., Dixon H., Generosa A., Nana G., 2011. The economic benefits of standards to New Zealand [Electronic resource]. The Standards Council of New Zealand, The Building Research Association of New Zealand, 74 p., available: https:standards.go-vt.nz/assets/News/Economic-benefits-of-Standardisation-to-New-Zealand/BERLreportonthe-economicbenefitsofSNZAug2011.pdf [accessed 2019].
15 Economic Value of Standardisation. Standards Council Canada, 2007, available: https:bsigroup.com/en-GB/standards/benefits-of-using-standards/research-reports/previous-research/ [accessed 2019].
16 The Empirical Economics of Standards. DTI Economics Papers, no. 12. 2005, 123 ?., available: https:webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121205151320/http:bis.gov.uk/files/file9655.pdf [accessed 2019].
17 Standards and Standardization: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. Information Resources Management Association USA, IGI Global, 2015, 1655 p.
18 Sharafutdinova E.N., 2016. Aktual'nye ekonomicheskie aspekty standartizatsii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Topical economic aspects of standardization in the Russian Federation]. Upravlenets [Manager], no. 3(61), pp. 77-81. (In Russian).
19 Rubin G.Sh., Danilova Yu.V., Polyakova M.A., 2017. Sistemnyy analiz v standartizatsii. Printsip sistemnosti v standartizatsii [System analysis in standardization. The principle of systematization in standardization]. Sovremennye tekhnologii. Sistemnyy analiz. Modelirovanie [Modern Technologies. System Analysis. Modeling], no. 1(53), pp. 118-123. (In Russian).
20 Sekerin V.D., Gorokhova A.E., 2013. Upravlenie standartizatsiey v novykh ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh [Management of standardization under new economic conditions]. Upravlenie kachestvom: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Quality Management: International Proc. Scientific Practical Conference]. Moscow, University of Mechanical Engineering Publ., pp. 46-50. (In Russian).
